Wingman

Here's a picture of my heavily modified Flyye Vest and a comparison to the ingame Screenshots. It even has the two seamlines on top of the Ammo Pouches so the Flyye Vest comes with most details that are shown in the game. I completely removed the ammo Pouches and placed them lower to match the ingame reference and i also removed Molle straps and replaced them. So to me the Flyye vest it still a good base if modified.

@tipperaryred I'm ok with all the updates for the basic stuff that could get used by both departments for approval. Really nice work. The only thing that feels a bit nitpick is that the Vest should be the same fabric as the Suit. In real life tactical vests are made out of codura fabric and so people get forced to get a custom made vest. Many people using the Flyye Law Enforcement Vests as base and customized them to get them accurate which wouldn't be possible anymore with this restriction. So feels a bit like Gatekeeping somehow as for basic approval as the attendant needs to get a custom made vest which are not easy to get in many regions. How do you guys see it? In this screenshot you can see that the weave of the vest is not as fine as the one of the suit.

Oh sorry. Was on vacation and had much to do. I'll have a look at it and respond soon.

Thank you Here's a comparison between the Inferno Helmet and the Rogue One Tie Pilot Helmet. You can see that the molds are totally different. The Inferno Helmet is also smaller as the Rogue One Helmet. The teeth sections are different and the Vocoder of the Rogue One Helmet is vacformed but for the Infernos it has to be a separate piece. The Trident and the sideburns looks different too. And on the back view you can see that the Mohawk Strip on the Inferno is not as wide as on the Rogue One Helmet.

Hi Guys, I am the DCA of the JRS that is responsible for the Infernos and have worked on the Inferno CRLs from the very beginning. It would be a pleasure for us to work together, as many members seek approval as Del and Hask, and so the CRLs in both detachments should be set up equally when it comes to all parts that can be used by both characters. After consultation with the current JRS CS, we are open to any cooperation. Dennis Opfermann TX/TI 50883

Here's a comparison of mine to the imgame graphic

I used this dust protection foil for PC Fans. https://amzn.eu/d/2jNfByY It's a bit flexible so you can lay it nicely flat over the lenses from the inside.

I used this dust protection foil for PC Fans. https://amzn.eu/d/2jNfByY It's a bit flexible so you can lay it nicely flat over the lenses from the inside.

My Lenses are from Jintalol Wang. But the ones from MonCal are also good to go. I tried the ones from Ople Props but wouldn't recommend them. Very blurry vision and the mesh is not as correct as it should be as the holes in the mesh are to big and not fine enough.

I have a recommendation for the Overbelt Wouldn't it be better to add that a standard scout belt wouldn't be approvable for as Overbelt for Del? And thanks for deleting that the Pillbox has to be functional. (And no, we as the JRS DCAs, didn't brought that in it was Anton who wanted it to be added as he saw a screenshot where the Pillbox looks like it is slightly opened or functional.) 😉

Hi tipperaryred, that's exactly the point. Thanks for looking into it and maybe change it. Looking forward to it. Thanks and cheers, Dennis TX-50883

I glued Belt Clips to my DT and it just hang on the Overbelt.

3cm and ingame shots for comparison So if you compare 3cm width with the ingame shots, it's definitely more correct than 4 cm width. What do you think and can this may get changed in the CRLs? Thanks in advance Dennis TX-50883

Hi at all. I have to request the width of the Overbelt again. In the CRL it states 4cm width but this can't be if you compare the ingame reference with the real costume parts. I've used a 4cm till now but as you can see in my pictures, it doesn't match the width of the ingame shots. Can this may get changed in the CRL to 3cm-4cm as 3 would look much more accurate as just 4cm.

3cm and ingame shots for comparison So if you compare 3cm width with the ingame shots, it's definitely more correct than 4 cm width. What do you think and can this may get changed in the CRLs? Thanks in advance Dennis TX-50883