marktoots[501st] Posted December 22, 2016 Author Share Posted December 22, 2016 A few more updates with some photos of Tom's armour. Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk Link to comment
Griffin-X[501st] Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Great updates Mark! Link to comment
DeadpoolTK11686[TX] Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 👌ðŸ¼ðŸ‘ŒðŸ¼ðŸ‘🼠this is coming together Exciting times ahead Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 23, 2016 Author Share Posted December 23, 2016 Can't take all of the credit on this. Tom Campbell whose armour is in the photos has help with its description. More to follow Once I have recovered from seeing these bad boys in action for the first time. Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk Link to comment
Khaos[501st] Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 Nice work! Just curious...are you guys planning to keep the TX prefix or pick up the canon prefix of DT? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 24, 2016 Author Share Posted December 24, 2016 Nice work! Just curious...are you guys planning to keep the TX prefix or pick up the canon prefix of DT? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I'd like to go with the DT Prefix but I thought that stormtrooper variants had to start with "T"!? Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk Link to comment
Griffin-X[501st] Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 I'd like to go with the DT Prefix but I thought that stormtrooper variants had to start with "T"!? Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk The new Shoretrooper has an ST designation. So it seems we have some room to wiggle. I say we request the DT prefix but it'll be up to the DL and the LMO. 2 Link to comment
retrofire[501st] Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 The new Shoretrooper has an ST designation. So it seems we have some room to wiggle. I say we request the DT prefix but it'll be up to the DL and the LMO. I'd kinda miss the "x" part of the designation that is solely Spec Ops but the DT does certainly make sense. Link to comment
Darth Emphatic[CMD-DWM] Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 I am for the DT designation and plan to push for it. 3 Link to comment
TommyC1138[501st] Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 I am for the DT designation and plan to push for it. Being new to this detachment and hopefully a permanent resident soon I have no affiliation to any past designations, but I fully agree with "Darth Emphatic" Steve that it should be DT for the Death Trooper. 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 26, 2016 Author Share Posted December 26, 2016 I have changed the designation at the top if the CRL. It is now what it should be I had forgotten that the ST had set the precident. Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment
TheKernei Posted December 28, 2016 Share Posted December 28, 2016 I've been following this rather closely, but does anyone know if this is nearing a state where it can be submitted for official 501st approval? Link to comment
Darth Emphatic[CMD-DWM] Posted December 29, 2016 Share Posted December 29, 2016 CRL is still WIP and will need additional photos. However, if one was completed, we could run it through the LMO directly. 2 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 30, 2016 Author Share Posted December 30, 2016 Further details added to the CRL. Have tried to provide detailed photos of each part to support the descriptions but am limited by the number of photos allowed so will add more detail to the armour thread shortly. 1 Link to comment
Griffin-X[501st] Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Further details added to the CRL. Have tried to provide detailed photos of each part to support the descriptions but am limited by the number of photos allowed so will add more detail to the armour thread shortly. Thanks for all your hard work. If you can, try to keep them all together in this thread. You can create a new post within the forum thread, maybe one post per object or armor part. 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 30, 2016 Author Share Posted December 30, 2016 Thanks for all your hard work. If you can, try to keep them all together in this thread. You can create a new post within the forum thread, maybe one post per object or armor part. Thanks Jim. Will do that but I also need to update the armour thread anyway so will still put them there as well Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 30, 2016 Author Share Posted December 30, 2016 Additional CRL Photos - Helmet: Additional CRL Photos - Shoulder Bells: Additional CRL Photos - Biceps: 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 31, 2016 Author Share Posted December 31, 2016 Additional CRL Photos - Forearms: Right Forearm Armour: Left Forearm Armour: Additional CRL Photos - Chest/Back Plate: Additional CRL Photos - Abdominal Plate: 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 31, 2016 Author Share Posted December 31, 2016 Additional CRL Photos - Thighs: Right Thigh Armour: Left Thigh Armour: Additional CRL Photos - Shins: Right Shin Armour: Left Shin Armour: Additional CRL Photos - Pauldron: Additional CRL Photos - Ammo Pouches: Additional CRL Photos - Chest Rig and Grenades: 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 31, 2016 Author Share Posted December 31, 2016 Just need to add some more photos and descriptions of the chest rig and modified DLT, and this will be done! 1 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 31, 2016 Author Share Posted December 31, 2016 Submission of DT CRL for CS Review. I intend on submitting the CRL for formal Command Staff review on Thursday 5th January, so if anyone has any comments/feedback can you please provide them on this thread by midnight PST on Tuesday 3rd January 2017 so I have time to consider and incorporate them as appropriate. Should there be no feedback provided by that point then I will assume that it is acceptable to the members. Thanks 3 Link to comment
feliz[TX] Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 I feel that you should loosen the requirements for basic approval regarding rib sizing for the undersuit and allow a little more tolerance with this. Most people simply do not have the time or sewing skills to build this suit and will either have to use what materials are available to them or find a maker who produces them to this exact spec. It's simply not realistic and for those of us who may want to try to piece the undersuit together ourselves, it may be unachievable. I would leave the exact measurements for a higher tier approval. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment
feliz[TX] Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 I apologize as it looks like Tapatalk just posted my reply a billion times. Sorry about that. 2 Link to comment
marktoots[501st] Posted December 31, 2016 Author Share Posted December 31, 2016 I feel that you should loosen the requirements for basic approval regarding rib sizing for the undersuit and allow a little more tolerance with this. Most people simply do not have the time or sewing skills to build this suit and will either have to use what materials are available to them or find a maker who produces them to this exact spec. It's simply not realistic and for those of us who may want to try to piece the undersuit together ourselves, it may be unachievable. I would leave the exact measurements for a higher tier approval. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I understand where you are coming from and based on evidence from the ST CRL the rib sizing is likely to be removed so moving it to level 2 is a reasonable compromise. I'd be interested in other opinion on this? Also, if we are going to simplify the basic clearance to remove the ribbing sizes do we also reduce the boot requirement to a boot with flat sole for basic clearance and move DM's with flat sole to level 2 or greater? Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment
feliz[TX] Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Thanks for your reply and understanding Mark! Regarding the boots, you'll most likely have some people trying to gain height by using larger soled boots so maybe a little leeway on those would be good too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now