Imperial Army Trooper - Andor - CRL Discussion

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 18, 2023

@BigJasoni Oh dear, sorry, I didn't see your post while I was typing up my own!

With your clarification everything makes sense to me - we're totally on the same page here

Great insight, thank you!

**BigJasoni[TX]** · January 18, 2023

1 hour ago, Detaleader said:

Good pic. The only thing I still can't figure out is how the D Ring is actually attached to the buffer tube. Hmm... do blasters require a buffer tube? 🤔Regardless, here's some sling swivels that I think I could force on there.

The picture also reminds me of something else concerning the magazine. We've seen quite a few magazines which are essentially curved boxes sitting in the magazine well. I understand people wanting to get a blaster out to the community, plus it's fun designing these things, but I do think we need to ensure designers/ makers are at least trying to get these things right. Unfortunately, I've seen a lot of shortcuts taken as people rush to be the first out there offering accessories.

Please notice the shape of the bottom of the magazine as well as the "wavy" pattern on the rear. Below is a picture of my full size Sterling SMG Airsoft magazine as well as the correct sized one I printed:

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 18, 2023

Sorry for the double post. I did end up using my lunch break for this. It may be ever so slightly too thorough, but I think this should do the trick? Please let me know if I forgot anything!

E-10.5 Blaster

· Based on a real or replica Sterling sub-machine gun, scratch-built, cast, 3D print or a modified commercial toy Stormtrooper blaster.

· The Magazine is longer than Original Trilogy Blasters

· A sliding Stock is mounted on the endcap of the Blaster. The retractable feature need not function.

· A Sling may be attached on one or two points of the Blaster.

OPTIONAL Level two certification (if applicable):

· Blaster shall be based on a real or replica S&T Sterling L2A1 AEG Airsoft Gun. (Folding Stock does not need to function)

· 3D printed blasters can not contain visible print lines and must be sanded smooth for a more realistic appearance.

· The recessed strip behind the bolt may be hollow, filled or partially filled.

· Scope shall be a real or replica M.H.R. (Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Co.) M38 Telescope. 1943 model is preferred.

· Counter shall be a real or replica Hengstler 400 Series counter. Eagle logo is preferred.

· Power Cylinders shall be mounted on top of the magazine well. R1 style power cylinders are preferred over ANH style.

· A grille shaped detail piece is attached on top of the Magazine. It features 8 slots.

· 6 rows of T-Tracks cover the Sterling receiver holes except for the lower left row with the bayonet lug.

· A sling swivel may be fitted near the muzzle, on the same lower left row as the bayonet lug.

· A 3-Slot Picatinny rail is fitted on the row above the bayonet lug. The rail is affixed with two screws.

· A sling swivel is fitted underneath the stock extension.

· If a sling is attached, it is made of webbing and uses snap hook buckles. The sling is attached to the swivel underneath the stock.

· The stock is modelled after a 416C pattern

OPTIONAL Level three certification (if applicable):

Grip assembly and blaster dimensions are based on an S&T Airsoft sterling. Blasters based on real Sterling SMGs are not allowed. If an Airsoft Sterling is used, it mustn’t function.
Scope shall be a real or replica 1943 M.H.R. Co. M38 Telescope, 1942 model is not allowed.
Counter shall be a real or replica Hengstler 400 Series counter with Small eagle logo. Large eagle logo is not allowed.
Power Cylinders shall be R1 style, ANH style is not allowed.
The screws that mount the picatinny rail are on the outer end of the rail and do not interfere with the rail slots.
The buttplate on the stock may not be ribbed and has a small rectangular greeblie fitted

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 18, 2023

3 minutes ago, BigJasoni said:

Good pic. The only thing I still can't figure out is how the D Ring is actually attached to the buffer tube. Hmm... do blasters require a buffer tube? 🤔Regardless, here's some sling swivels that I think I could force on there.

The picture also reminds me of something else concerning the magazine. We've seen quite a few magazines which are essentially curved boxes sitting in the magazine well. I understand people wanting to get a blaster out to the community, plus it's fun designing these things, but I do think we need to ensure designers/ makers are at least trying to get these things right. Unfortunately, I've seen a lot of shortcuts taken as people rush to be the first out there offering accessories.

Please notice the shape of the bottom of the magazine as well as the "wavy" pattern on the rear. Below is a picture of my full size Sterling SMG Airsoft magazine as well as the correct sized one I printed:

Great detail questions! Here's my take on it:

I don't think the source material gives us clear enough view to verify what kind of sling loop was used/how it attached. It could be a QD loop like this, or something pinned in place otherwise. I don't think we should really specify, for now. If we get better reference later, we can always update with that in mind.

Good catch on the magazine! I think for me personally, this pattern falls under being part of a real/replica Sterling. Looking at other CRLs, across various detachments, it doesn't seem to be specified there either.

ALSO! Before I forget it:

Once we get the E-10.5 out of the way, the text for E-11 and DLT-19 options should be super easy to make. We just take the ones from the R1TK CRL and instead of flashlight, we replace any mention with a 3-slot picatinny rail.

**BigJasoni[TX]** · January 18, 2023

Everything looks great. I'm going to keep working on these different versions of the blaster and get them out there as soon as possible.
Now, back to the armor.

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 18, 2023

The armor should be pretty well nailed down. If things are looking good for this blaster, it's likely time to move onto other optional accessories such as the blaster pistol and its holster. What do you think @Blackwatch?

**BigJasoni[TX]** · January 19, 2023

On 12/2/2022 at 11:52 AM, Blackwatch said:

Boss man Mark has reached out to the LMO to request that we recieve the soft version without armor, under the same principle that a TIE Reserve is a TIE without armor. The LMO has not responded but that reasoning is sound.

Lets look at cleaning up the back:

Change Log 1.2

Back Armor

Back plate is painted to match the chest armor and helmet.
Back plate has a collar that extends upwards and tapers to the chest plate.
Chest and back plate meet at the sides.

The backplate features painted details that vary from trooper to trooper. Acceptable colors for these details are either silver or gunmetal, but one color must be chosen. Mix and match of the detail items is not permitted.
There are 2 hose connectors located at the top of the back plate approximately centered above each rectangular cut out/greeblie.

Hose connecters are painted to match the strap raised slot , strap , buckle and recessed box color.
Back has two large cut out recesses with vent details and greeblies inside, all painted silver or gunmetal. The silver or gunmetal paint does not leave the edge of the box opening.
The vents at the top of the boxes ~~are painted black inside each cell.~~ may have the openings darkened with weathering.

Four raised bars approximately .375" (10mm) long aligned to the top of the recessed box opening may be present.
~~The walls and floor of the recesses shall be painted to match the rest of the armor.~~

Each recess has different and specific set of boxes inside that are painted to match the recessed box color. Light weathering is permitted.

Bottom left features a smaller rectangle cut out with the left side stepped. ~~The floor of the cut out and the walls inside match the color of the armor.~~
Half circle indent detail beneath the backpack section must be present.
There is a long thin raised greeblie positioned central and below the 2 large recess.
There is a small raised circle greeblie positioned central and below the above named greeblie.
There is a raised slot on each shoulder for the straps to fit into. The raised slots are painted either silver or gunmetal grey.
Shoulder straps are black and are affixed to the chest plate at the buckle. The chest buckle shall match the raised slot color.

OPTIONAL Level two certification (if applicable):
The hose fittings are angled forward.

There is a recessed hole approximately .31" (7.8mm) above the top left corner of the left recessed box.

There are two indented squares approximately .25"x .25" (5mmx5mm) aligned vertically above the right upper corner of the left recessed box.

Ok. I definitely don't want to diminish the awesome work that was done previously on the armor since I was late to the party, but one part of the back armor that's been overlooked (as it was with the Mudtrooper CRL) is the stepped ledge under the main back box. This is from the level 2 requirement for the Shoretrooper:

There is a stepped ledge at the bottom of the main back box.

Now with that said, the Shoretrooper and Mudtrooper armor are different, but other than the shape of the very bottom of the back/ kidney section, the remaining elements are the same. This ledge is a small piece that amounts to nothing more than a strip under the main box, but since the costume designers felt obliged to add it, we should too as a higher level requirement.

Here's a pic of my mudtrooper armor for reference as well as a couple screen caps so you see what I'm talking about:

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 19, 2023

10 hours ago, BigJasoni said:

Ok. I definitely don't want to diminish the awesome work that was done previously on the armor since I was late to the party, but one part of the back armor that's been overlooked (as it was with the Mudtrooper CRL) is the stepped ledge under the main back box. This is from the level 2 requirement for the Shoretrooper:

There is a stepped ledge at the bottom of the main back box.

Now with that said, the Shoretrooper and Mudtrooper armor are different, but other than the shape of the very bottom of the back/ kidney section, the remaining elements are the same. This ledge is a small piece that amounts to nothing more than a strip under the main box, but since the costume designers felt obliged to add it, we should too as a higher level requirement.

Here's a pic of my mudtrooper armor for reference as well as a couple screen caps so you see what I'm talking about:

I guess I took that for granted since my Imperial Surplus kit has that stepped ledge.

Not a bad idea to denote it in L2. Thoughts from others?

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 19, 2023

45 minutes ago, TeaJay said:

I guess I took that for granted since my Imperial Surplus kit has that stepped ledge.

Not a bad idea to denote it in L2. Thoughts from others?

Sounds good to me. As a side note: We should probably retrofit that info on the Muddy then (I know, broken record at this point )

**Blackwatch[CMD-DCA]** · January 20, 2023

Im back to the forum after a few days, and we have two different things to consider.

I do not want to jump all over, so we will address the blaster, then move to re-address the back armor since that was finalized weeks ago.

We only recognize L2 for Specialist, not L3 so ill be rewriting some of the proposal to fit L2. Print lines shall always be sanded off for approval, so Im moving that to L1.

So, for the blaster, I want to address that first, and get that totally 100% locked into place before we go on to anything else.

E 10.5 Blaster

Change Log 2.0

E-10.5 Blaster

Based on a real or replica Sterling sub-machine gun, scratch-built, cast, 3D print or a modified commercial toy Stormtrooper blaster.

The magazine is longer than Original Trilogy blasters.

Power Cylinders shall be mounted on top of the magazine well. R1 style power cylinders are preferred over ANH style.

A sliding stock is mounted on the endcap of the Blaster. The retractable feature need not function.

A Sling may be attached on one or two points of the Blaster.

3D printed blasters can not contain visible print lines and must be sanded smooth for a more realistic appearance.

OPTIONAL Level two certification (if applicable):

Blaster shall be based on a real or replica S&T Sterling L2A1 AEG Airsoft Gun. (Folding Stock does not need to function)

Grip assembly and blaster dimensions are based on an S&T Airsoft sterling. If an Airsoft Sterling is used, it must not function.

The recessed strip behind the bolt may be hollow, filled or partially filled.

Scope shall be a real or replica M.H.R. (Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Co.) 1943 model M38 Telescope.

Counter shall be a real or replica Hengstler 400 Series counter with small eagle logo. Large eagle logo is not allowed.

A grille shaped detail piece is attached on top of the Magazine. It features 8 slots.

6 rows of T-Tracks cover the Sterling receiver holes except for the lower left row with the bayonet lug.

A sling swivel may be fitted near the muzzle, on the same lower left row as the bayonet lug.

A 3-Slot Picatinny rail is fitted on the row above the bayonet lug. The rail is affixed with two screws. The screws do not interfere with the rail slots.

A sling swivel is fitted underneath the stock extension.

If a sling is attached, it is made of webbing and uses snap hook buckles. The sling is attached to the swivel underneath the stock.

The stock is modelled after a 416C pattern. The buttplate on the stock may not be ribbed and has a small rectangular greeblie fitted.

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 20, 2023

1 hour ago, Blackwatch said:

Im back to the forum after a few days, and we have two different things to consider.

I do not want to jump all over, so we will address the blaster, then move to re-address the back armor since that was finalized weeks ago.

We only recognize L2 for Specialist, not L3 so ill be rewriting some of the proposal to fit L2. Print lines shall always be sanded off for approval, so Im moving that to L1.

So, for the blaster, I want to address that first, and get that totally 100% locked into place before we go on to anything else.

E 10.5 Blaster

Change Log 2.0

E-10.5 Blaster

Based on a real or replica Sterling sub-machine gun, scratch-built, cast, 3D print or a modified commercial toy Stormtrooper blaster.

The magazine is longer than Original Trilogy blasters.

Power Cylinders shall be mounted on top of the magazine well. R1 style power cylinders are preferred over ANH style.

A sliding stock is mounted on the endcap of the Blaster. The retractable feature need not function.

A Sling may be attached on one or two points of the Blaster.

3D printed blasters can not contain visible print lines and must be sanded smooth for a more realistic appearance.

OPTIONAL Level two certification (if applicable):

Blaster shall be based on a real or replica S&T Sterling L2A1 AEG Airsoft Gun. (Folding Stock does not need to function)

Grip assembly and blaster dimensions are based on an S&T Airsoft sterling. If an Airsoft Sterling is used, it must not function.

The recessed strip behind the bolt may be hollow, filled or partially filled.

Scope shall be a real or replica M.H.R. (Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Co.) 1943 model M38 Telescope.

Counter shall be a real or replica Hengstler 400 Series counter with small eagle logo. Large eagle logo is not allowed.

A grille shaped detail piece is attached on top of the Magazine. It features 8 slots.

6 rows of T-Tracks cover the Sterling receiver holes except for the lower left row with the bayonet lug.

A sling swivel may be fitted near the muzzle, on the same lower left row as the bayonet lug.

A 3-Slot Picatinny rail is fitted on the row above the bayonet lug. The rail is affixed with two screws. The screws do not interfere with the rail slots.

A sling swivel is fitted underneath the stock extension.

If a sling is attached, it is made of webbing and uses snap hook buckles. The sling is attached to the swivel underneath the stock.

The stock is modelled after a 416C pattern. The buttplate on the stock may not be ribbed and has a small rectangular greeblie fitted.

Looks good so far!

Only change I would really make is that the L2 requirements on the blaster basis can be folded into one line: "Blaster shall be based on a real or replica S&T Sterling L2A1 AEG Airsoft Gun. (Folding Stock does not need to function) If an Airsoft Sterling is used, it must not function."

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 22, 2023

@Blackwatch -- I've taken photos of the various components of my kit and photoshopped out the backgrounds. I did not do my boots as they are currently buried in a sea of costumes in our guestroom due to home repairs from the pipe burst back in Dec...

I plan on digging those out tomorrow and fully suiting up in the evening, assuming I can get my wife to take photos.

We will still need photos of the helmet/goggles once someone completes those and the rank-bar shoulder bell; perhaps we can use Justin's that he recently posted...

And of course the weapons and other optional accessories.

Here's the album, I have it set for view for anyone who has the link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rCI9_phNdunZo9prwVgo3kVRJm7bERgx?usp=share_link

If you or any other Detachment staff need any revisions to these photos, feel free to let me know. We'll definitely need others contributions to fully flesh out the different variations to this one.

Quick clarification point. I added an additional backplate photo with transparent grills. I have mine cut out to provide shadow/darkness depth when wearing it similar to my tanktrooper. When using a white sheet to take photos, you can see the white coloration between the grill gaps. So use whichever you feel is best.

**fb501[TX]** · January 22, 2023

One thing I would like to highlight for the CRL is the belt boxes are unique and quite different in size from ones we have seen before. They were resin casts and smaller than the Rogue One boxes

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 22, 2023

2 hours ago, fb501 said:

One thing I would like to highlight for the CRL is the belt boxes are unique and quite different in size from ones we have seen before. They were resin casts and smaller than the Rogue One boxes

From the earlier discussion...

R1/Mando/Solo/Obi: 75mm tall, 50mm wide and 25mm deep

Andor: 67mm tall, 45mm wide and 25mm deep

The difference being 8mm X 5mm. Would we want to enforce that small of a difference for L2, making everyone get unique belt boxes that are less than 1cm on each side compared to the HD era films/shows (R1/Mando/Solo/Obi)?

I'm curious if the belt boxes are the same for the background performers and the main cast? They are likely the same...

For CRL photo purposes, it would be wise for @fb501to provide photos since his are screen used, but I personally don't feel strongly that the CRL should be updated to strictly enforce for the belt boxes to be reduced by 8mm X 5mm unless the detachment would consider a L3 tier.

If no L3 program exists, it would be worth updating the description to at least include the range of the unique size that @fb501listed up to the maximum of the HD era films/shows.

I'm not opposed to the idea and am okay with it for the pure sake of on-screen accuracy, if that's where Detachment staff wishes to take it. If the Detachment staff doesn't have an L3 program that adds a lot of overhead... so at the end of the day up to them. Is 8mm X 5mm noticeable visually compared to the other boxes from talking distance (6-ish feet)?

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 22, 2023

3 hours ago, TeaJay said:

From the earlier discussion...

R1/Mando/Solo/Obi: 75mm tall, 50mm wide and 25mm deep

Andor: 67mm tall, 45mm wide and 25mm deep

The difference being 8mm X 5mm. Would we want to enforce that small of a difference for L2, making everyone get unique belt boxes that are less than 1cm on each side compared to the HD era films/shows (R1/Mando/Solo/Obi)?

I'm curious if the belt boxes are the same for the background performers and the main cast? They are likely the same...

For CRL photo purposes, it would be wise for @fb501to provide photos since his are screen used, but I personally don't feel strongly that the CRL should be updated to strictly enforce for the belt boxes to be reduced by 8mm X 5mm unless the detachment would consider a L3 tier.

If no L3 program exists, it would be worth updating the description to at least include the range of the unique size that @fb501listed up to the maximum of the HD era films/shows.

I'm not opposed to the idea and am okay with it for the pure sake of on-screen accuracy, if that's where Detachment staff wishes to take it. If the Detachment staff doesn't have an L3 program that adds a lot of overhead... so at the end of the day up to them. Is 8mm X 5mm noticeable visually compared to the other boxes from talking distance (6-ish feet)?

I concur. I would like it to be an option for those who strive for "full" accuracy, but if people already have "non saga" boxes, then they should be able to use them.

Trooper 71276 · January 23, 2023

Hello. I do apologize for the non build related question, but will this impression be eligible for the Specialist program? If so, will everything have to be Level 2 certified, or will the blaster additionally have to be Level 3?

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 24, 2023

19 hours ago, Trooper 71276 said:

Hello. I do apologize for the non build related question, but will this impression be eligible for the Specialist program? If so, will everything have to be Level 2 certified, or will the blaster additionally have to be Level 3?

This question is best answered by Detachment staff, but from reviewing the other CRLs and costume level structure of the detachment, they do not have a L3 program at the moment and one would assume that anything approved by the detachment at L2 would be considered part of Specialist program unless they reserve that specific title for specific costumes.

From above discussions noted by @Blackwatch, he will be placing all the L3 text into L2 for the blaster. The original writeup was from another existing writeup, so please ignore the L3 component.

On 1/20/2023 at 9:31 AM, Blackwatch said:

We only recognize L2 for Specialist, not L3 so ill be rewriting some of the proposal to fit L2. Print lines shall always be sanded off for approval, so Im moving that to L1.

This sparks a question that I have for detachment staff; are members who are applying for L2 required to have a blaster? I know some detachments require specific combinations that include weapons and other do not. I'm hoping we do not have to have a weapon to achieve level 2.

**Blackwatch[CMD-DCA]** · January 24, 2023

Im back, there are times where Im not able to get to a computer for a day or two. This weekend was INSANE, I got homer from work past midnight on Sunday. I was technically off this weekend.

We do not have an L3 since so much of our Detachment historically was based in comic books and low resolution game graphics. Our Specialist program is built to an L2 standard. Until the most recent movies, we as a Detachment had no "screen used". Even now most of our development is game stuff. Several Garrisons around the world do not have blasters. The rest of the costume would be judged accordingly. The Specialist applicant need only state that blasters are not allowed per National law. Right now the Engineer does not have, or carry, a blaster, so when I became the CRL model I just photographed the costume parts. That was some VERY low resolution comic art to work from.

Im personally not so concerned with belt box sizes as long as we have a guideline. I can add a text line with suggested sizes based on the discussion above and that will be L2 requirement stuff. When I was writing the Del Meeko CRL we got down to splitting millimeters into tenths of a MM for L2 based on game mechanics. I do not want to revisit that. The various vendors are going to supply what they supply, and those of us 3d printing will print at the printed size. Adding a suggested size requirement text will be in line with all other CRLs developed with L2 standards for the Detachment.

I have updated the text for the belt boxes and for the back of the main box with its step , that is in the very first post of this topic.

On the blaster Im going to take the suggestion for text revision and work it into this update:

E 10.5 Blaster

Change Log 2.1

E-10.5 Blaster

Based on a real or replica Sterling sub-machine gun, scratch-built, cast, 3D print or a modified commercial toy Stormtrooper blaster.

The magazine is longer than Original Trilogy blasters.

Power Cylinders shall be mounted on top of the magazine well. R1 style power cylinders are preferred over ANH style.

A sliding stock is mounted on the endcap of the Blaster. The retractable feature need not function.

A Sling may be attached on one or two points of the Blaster.

3D printed blasters can not contain visible print lines and must be sanded smooth for a more realistic appearance.

OPTIONAL Level two certification (if applicable):

Blaster shall be based on a real or replica S&T Sterling L2A1 AEG Airsoft Gun. (Folding Stock does not need to function) If an Airsoft Sterling is used, it must not function.

Grip assembly and blaster dimensions are based on an S&T Airsoft sterling.

The recessed strip behind the bolt may be hollow, filled or partially filled.

Scope shall be a real or replica M.H.R. (Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Co.) 1943 model M38 Telescope.

Counter shall be a real or replica Hengstler 400 Series counter with small eagle logo. Large eagle logo is not allowed.

A grille shaped detail piece is attached on top of the Magazine. It features 8 slots.

6 rows of T-Tracks cover the Sterling receiver holes except for the lower left row with the bayonet lug.

A sling swivel may be fitted near the muzzle, on the same lower left row as the bayonet lug.

A 3-Slot Picatinny rail is fitted on the row above the bayonet lug. The rail is affixed with two screws. The screws do not interfere with the rail slots.

A sling swivel is fitted underneath the stock extension.

If a sling is attached, it is made of webbing and uses snap hook buckles. The sling is attached to the swivel underneath the stock.

The stock is modelled after a 416C pattern. The buttplate on the stock may not be ribbed and has a small rectangular greeblie fitted.

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 24, 2023

1 hour ago, Blackwatch said:

The various vendors are going to supply what they supply, and those of us 3d printing will print at the printed size. Adding a suggested size requirement text will be in line with all other CRLs developed with L2 standards for the Detachment.

I have updated the text for the belt boxes and for the back of the main box with its step , that is in the very first post of this topic.

Just for clarification, is the plan to fully enforce the smaller size 8mm x 5mm reduction for L2 and not allow for a range up to the R1/Mando/Obi/Solo (non-saga) option at that L2 option?

Should we not provide a range or is the preference the exact size down to the mm? The way it is now written, it must be the exact mm of the smaller than non-saga boxes. Is that what is desired from detachment staff?

**Blackwatch[CMD-DCA]** · January 24, 2023

We are writing the boxes to the same set of standards written for the rest of the CRLs in the Detachment.

Also note the use of the word approximately in each of the text descriptions. This will all go to LMO review, and likely kicked back at least once by the LMO based on my experience writing CRLs.

If the boxes are smaller than the R1 boxes, then we need to write them as being smaller. If not, then there is no reason to write any of the size description for L2 , and all boxes will just be L1. I can write it as a maximum, saying something like "boxes shall not exceed X Y Z"

L2 is a Specialist, and goes through a separate approval process which meets a different, tighter standard.

**TeaJay[TX]** · January 24, 2023

13 minutes ago, Blackwatch said:

We are writing the boxes to the same set of standards written for the rest of the CRLs in the Detachment.

Also not the use of the word approximately in each of the text descriptions. This will all go to LMO review, and likely kicked back at least once by the LMO based on my experience writing CRLs.

If you who are giving us the info on the sizes say that they are smaller than the R1 boxes, then we need to write them smaller. If not, then there is no reason to write any of the size description in L2 , and all boxes will be L1.

Sounds good; just wanted to seek clarification on the plan.

Just for the record, the smaller box info was originally provided by @fb501, I do not want to take any credit there; I was just organizing the info from previous convos on this thread and don't want anything to get lost in the fray.

Hopefully folks are willing to provide print files for these different belt boxes.

**Blackwatch[CMD-DCA]** · January 25, 2023

With printing you can ( I mean me, as a printer) scale and size any STL or OBJ file to any size/ dimension needed. Thats one of the things printing excels at.

When Specialists applications are received we routinely ask for the item to be photographed with a ruler for the application, to confirm that it meets the L2 spec. I had to buy new parts for my own Specialist approval because what I was approved with for Basic did not meet L2.

How do we look on the Blaster, I would like to get this wrapped up so we can get it to the LMO.

**Detaleader[501st]** · January 25, 2023

3 minutes ago, Blackwatch said:

How do we look on the Blaster, I would like to get this wrapped up so we can get it to the LMO.

These two lines are functionally the same. I'd suggest deleting the bottom sentence, as it is covered in the first.

Otherwise, I'd say blaster is good to go

**Blackwatch[CMD-DCA]** · January 25, 2023

ok, thanks Ill make that change.

E 10.5 Blaster

Change Log 2.1.1