Jump to content

IcyTrooper

Detachment Web Master[CMD-DWM]
  • Posts

    3,937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    354

Everything posted by IcyTrooper

  1. Good morning! Boot weathering will be a requirement for L2 and an option on L1. As for the CRL image, I believe that the helmeted version is going to be version 1 and any additional versions will be subsequently numbered for if. We currently have the CRL page being worked on in the background and are making textual corrections as we see them (if needed). The images are almost all uploaded from the model and the editing of the images has been assigned. Thanks for all the participation!
  2. It is in the Special Notes, all of our newer CRLs (old ones are getting updated as time allows) and says: 3D Printed parts are permitted but all print lines and other artifacts must be removed.
  3. I like the v1.2 text to allow the 3D print option on it for local law compliance and flexibility. We may be able to actually remove the part about "3D printed" text since we have a general requirements disclaimer about 3D prints now. Thanks for your dedication on this! In the home stretch.
  4. No worries, we got the text drafted and I came to the realization that we didn't fully identify the model for this. I'll provide you with a link via PM (including the rest of the team) for uploading the unedited CRL pictures (we'll do the edits). I do believe that we are planning on using the R1 blaster text for the E-11.
  5. I think that info looks good on the weaponry, but we'll take the L3 stuff and consolidate it into the L2 requirements. I'm going to look at the first page and see that all that text makes sense. We can get the CRL wiki started on this and loading when that first page gets validated. @BigJasoni are you our model for this?
  6. I will be looking at the current progress this week, might be Wednesday afternoon/evening before I can dive in. Major thanks to @tipperaryred for leading the way on the text from the CRL team!
  7. Just an update to this that we will be moving forward with following the Pathfinders detachment to effectively prohibit Walt's Trooper Factory (WTF) version 1 (v1) helmet (as seen below) for basic approval on the following costumes after a 6-month grace period (detailed below): General Weir Shadow Scout Swamp Trooper An image of the WTF V1 helmet that will no longer be approvable: We are going to allow a 6-month grace period from today's date for the approval of any costumes that are currently being worked on with this helmet. The last day to get approval will be November 19, 2024. After this date the CRLs will have text added to it stating that the WTF v1 scout helmet is no longer approvable for basic approval. I'm sure there are other questions related to this, so we'll break it out like the Pathfinders did: What if I already have an approved kit? You will not need to do anything. Any costume that has been approved within the 501st Legion is grandfathered in, so long as the member remains active. What if I have the helmet but don't have the kit yet finished? You will have until November 19, 2024 to get everything completed and approved by your GML. What if I have the helmet and was retired from the 501st Legion and wish to be reactivated? You will have until November 19, 2024 to get your costume approved by your GML to move you back to active status (this is just like initial approval for the costume)
  8. Now that we are getting that Purge Trooper Phase 2 from Kenobi over to the LMOs on the final review we can get some resources over to this one. I know that we are going to push the Imperial Security Trooper to get across the finish line. I'll take a look at what has been suggested here and we can work it methodically as we have done with the other ones! I'm going to check with FISD on how they are going with their Night Troopers and how they are handling the variations of colors (creative liberty). I can also see if they are requiring those areas to be recessed (I don't believe so), or rather just painted on top. I am also in agreement with the no gloss for it, everything that I have seen has been that matte/satin finish. Since the Neuro-Saav Macromotion (NSM) Monitor is on both of the DTs in the scene, I can support it being a requirement.
  9. I think we'll be able to do both versions, but I second @Chaos that we check for additional damage on that one on other parts of the costume. I'm fairly certain we're going to have to put the disclaimer on that one with the exposed jaw like they do for the "Death Trooper" zombie TK. The disclaimer would be: Please note: This particular costume may not be welcome at all 501st events. This is not recommended as a primary Legion membership costume. Please contact your garrison CO/GML with any questions if you are planning to create one.
  10. Congrats on the approval!!
  11. We have the CRL text loaded into the wiki and are preparing the final images before LMO review
  12. I'd say that dye job is a job well done!
  13. I love seeing resin prints, they are always soooo smooth!
  14. We can use this thread for 3D modeling questions and the like. @HidingInCosplay @Chaos @Andreas Funk
  15. @Chaos thanks for the tag in on it! I'm a little hesitant on using this thread to work on the 3D modeling of the costume. I'd like to keep this thread for pulling the reference images out and then drafting the text. I'll go ahead and create a 3D modeling development thread for the past few questions. @Andreas Funk
  16. As @Gree23 mentioned, all black. We also have some alternate angle images in the CRL gallery as well: https://databank.501st.com/databank/CRL_Gallery:Shadow_Scout
  17. Yeah this is an interesting one for me, it is such a small detail for a differentiation between the two. I almost want to allow current E-10.5 for both the IAT:A and IST and perhaps we can modify the base CRL to state that it may have the rail and flashlight, or something along those lines? Another route could be using the IAT:A CRL E-10.5 base text and then modifying the L2 requirements to specifically show that it is different from the IAT:A CRL E-10.5? I know that FISD has a different E-11 CRL for ANH, ROTJ, ESB for example; but I feel like that may be unnecessary for such a small detail change.
  18. Posting it here for detachment visibility but I had a chat with the JRS DL and him and his team are in support of the Spec Ops detachment requesting the Imperial Special Forces costume for detachment placement when it comes to the LMOs. We'll do an official request in the near future.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.